Comments on: Arundhati Roy wants ‘Azadi’ for Kashmiris!

By: liyaqat nazir

liyaqat nazir — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:52:22 +0000

jai ho arundhati roy you are the true literaturer of the india

By: Jeshu

Jeshu — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:36:31 +0000

Well written Chakraborty, in the name of minority everyone is playing politics. No one cries or makes a hue when a hindu is in pain, only when something is done to Muslim all come to take the limelight.

SIMI was involved in so many blasts and politicans like Laloo and Mulayum made a statement that they have no issues with SIMI. And as soon as Malegaon Blast had some Hindu Organisations, these were the people who came forward and said Hindu Fundamentalist should be banned. What a DOUBLE STANDARD. We as Hindu arent minority, but always treated as MINORITY by this SELFISH Politicans. I do not support any blast, but how can these politicans label HINDU FUNDAMENTALIST to be BANNED. If that is the case, all Muslim Madrasas should be banned as they teach JIHAD and justify militants attack

Zor se bol, what are u doing? Can U write abt the double standards by Indian Politicans?

By: Chakraborty

Chakraborty — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:27:10 +0000

Being an Indian and a Bengali I am ashamed of her.
India needs freedom from Arundhuti as much as she needs it from India.
I can not imagine to what extent one can become greedy that one forgets own nation.
It is India that really did not take strict action against her.
If it was Bangladesh then she would have been prosecuted severely.
Where was Arundhati when this Kashmiris thrown out Pandits from kashmir?
Where did her emotions rest when Kashmiris shouted anti national slogan?
At one hand she supports communal countries like Palestine, Pak, Iraq and at other hand she calls India as communal.
She even supports Kashmiris who demand separate country on the basis of religion.
It is really confusing is she is communal or the opposite.
But one thing is clear–She might oppose India if it wins medal in Olympics.

By: rips

rips — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:50:49 +0000

Very well written Sahil. We will ask Jaggy to reply to that. Thanks
Zorsebol – Webmaster

By: Sahil Butt

Sahil Butt — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:22:35 +0000

This message in reply to Jaggy:

I respect what ever you have written but you being as an honest person, tell me do you really know the history of Jammu and Kashmir. It was a seperate and was an autonomous princely state adjacent to the territories of British India ruled by a Maharaja. After the departure of the British in 1947 the state was split between Pakistan and India as war erupted between the neighbours. India claimed that they had a treaty of accession signed by that times Maharaja to stay with India. I want to know who Maharaja was to decide the fate of people of J&K. If that treaty which India claims was original, still why the people of J&K where not allowed to decide their fate?
In 1947 the Indian Independence Act was passed, this meant that British India would become two independent states – Pakistan and India. Furthermore each of the princely states would be free to join India or Pakistan – or remain independent. Most of the princely states acceded to either of the two nations.

However the ruler of Kashmir wanted to remain independent, neither joining Pakistan or India, this lead to war between the two neighbouring countries in which Kashmir became divided between them.[10] Each considering that the former princely state belongs to them in its entirety and has lead to several wars. The Kashmir conflict between the two nuclear neighbours remains one of the most intractable and longest running disputes on the United Nations Security Council’s agenda.
Let the people of Jammu and Kashmir only decide their future. This was a princely state and should be like that only. People of J&K are fighting for that. They have no concerns with Pakistan and India.

I hope you got the message very loud and clear. These are the facts of J&K which every human being of earth should know and remember.